Thursday, October 9, 2014

Page 188 (9.423-465) "My dearest wife... poured in the"


editions: [1922] [html] [archv]
notes: [Th] [G&S] [Dent] [] [wbks] [rw] [images] [hyper]
Delaney: [338] Useen: [] [cp] maps: [other] [*]
fd: [337]
<

My dearest wife, Pericles says, was like this maid. Will any man love the daughter it he has not loved the mother?

Pericles V.1.118 'I am great with woe, and shall deliver weeping. My dearest wife was like this maid, and such a one My daughter might have been'


— The art of being a grandfather, Mr Best gan murmur. L'art d'être grandp...



— His own image to a man with that queer thing genius is the standard of all experience, material and moral. Such an appeal will touch him. The images of other males of his blood will repel him. He will see in them grotesque attempts of nature to foretell or repeat himself.



The benign forehead of the quaker librarian enkindled rosily with hope.



— I hope Mr Dedalus will work out his theory for the enlightenment of the public. And we ought to mention another Irish commentator, Mr George Bernard Shaw. Nor should we forget Mr Frank Harris. His articles on Shakespeare in the Saturday Review were surely brilliant. Oddly enough he too draws for us an unhappy relation with the dark lady of the sonnets. The favoured rival is William Herbert, earl of Pembroke. I own that if the poet must be rejected, such a rejection would seem more in harmony with— what shall I say?— our notions of what ought not to have been.



Felicitously he ceased and held a meek head among them, auk's egg, prize of their fray.



He thous and thees her with grave husbandwords. Dost love, Miriam? Dost love thy man?



— That may be too, Stephen said. There is a saying of Goethe's which Mr Magee likes to quote. Beware of what you wish for in youth because you will get it in middle life. Why does he send to one who is a buonaroba, a bay where all men ride, a maid of honour with a scandalous girlhood, a lordling to woo for him? He was himself a lord of language and had made himself a coistrel gentleman and he had written Romeo and Juliet. Why? Belief in himself has been untimely killed. He was overborne in a cornfield first (ryefield, I should say) and he will never be a victor in his own eyes after nor play victoriously the game of laugh and lie down. Assumed dongiovannism will not save him. No later undoing will undo the first undoing. The tusk of the boar has wounded him there where love lies ableeding. If the shrew is worsted yet there remains to her woman's invisible weapon. There is, I feel in the words, some goad of the flesh driving him into a new passion, a darker shadow of the first, darkening even his own understanding of himself. A like fate awaits him and the two rages commingle in a whirlpool.

Henry IV, Part 2 III.2.22 'I may say to you, we knew where the bona-robas were and had the best of them all at commandment. '

Sonnet 137 'If eyes corrupt by over-partial looks Be anchor'd in the bay where all men ride'
WS is punning 'bay' as a body of water where anchored ships ride, and a brown horse


They list. And in the porches of their ears I pour.



fd: [338]
— The soul has been before stricken mortally, a poison poured in the


>

mysteries:


[DD 03:25-04:41]
[DD 00:00-03:15]
[DD 00:00-00:07]

[IM 28:43-31:54]

[LV1 34:47-37:49]

[LV2 28:16-29:14]
[LV2 00:20-02:36]


No comments:

Post a Comment